Text-only image - click for high-contrast version Print image - click for printable version Larger text image - click to increase text size Smaller text image - click to descrease text size
The Sector Skills Council for Science, Engineering and Manufacturing Technologies

Views on Policy Issues - Higher Education Provision for the Science and Engineering Sectors (UK)

What do you think?

Semta represents the view of our employers across government and the media.  If you are an employer in the science, engineering, or manufacturing technology sectors, we welcome your views at policy@semta.org.uk

The issues

  • There is increasing pressure on Higher Education (HE) to engage directly with employers to meet their skill needs.  HE is therefore facing a number of challenges, including creating a successful dialogue with employers, changing its “offer” to reflect the needs of employers, and securing funding for a range of activity outside its traditional offer.
  • These changes mean non-traditional provision will expand more sub-degree level courses (many of which will have a “unit credit value” so an individual can build credit towards a full degree), more part-time provision and more accreditation of work-based learning (both in the admissions process and during courses).
  • Recent government reports, such as Innovation Nation and Lord Sainsbury’s “Race to the Top” publication, have urged an increase in Knowledge and Technology Transfer Partnership activity, which requires HE to work with industry on specific areas to share knowledge and resources for mutual benefit.
  • Current statistics on students in UK institutions suggest that a significant proportion (over 30%) of engineering and technology students are from outside UK.  This has implications for employers wishing to recruit these individuals, as those from outside the EU must have work permits, etc.
  • Engineering, science and technology graduates are much in demand from other sectors of the economy, and small firms in particular can struggle to compete with the salaries and graduate development programmes offered in large firms and other sectors.
  • Only a small percentage of engineering and technology graduates are employed in education five years after graduation (5%) compared to physical, mathematical and biological science graduates (21-24%).  This suggests that many physics, maths and biology teachers do not have much / any workplace industrial experience, which could make their teaching less inspirational.

Semta Employers View

  • There is still potential for HE to improve its dialogue with employers, by becoming more familiar with the commercial workplace and its demands.  It is essential that employers and HE “speak the same language” – understanding the drivers and influences on both, as well as the opportunities and limitations.
  • Employers greatly value work experience in graduates.  They are concerned that the number of “sandwich” courses and students appears to be falling (the actual numbers of students taking a “sandwich” year is actually increasing, but fewer students are enrolling on sandwich courses (see evidence and facts below).  Effective work experience is time consuming to arrange and manage, and employers would welcome incentives for both companies and HE institutions to offer this kind of opportunity to students.
  • Engineering employers have long supported progression from non-traditional routes into higher education.  Engineering Advanced Apprentices have a history of progression to degree course, particularly in large companies.  There is scope for even more of this kind of progression, if HE is willing to incorporate flexibilities in delivery.  For example, former apprentices are more likely to require day / block release than full-time provision, as they will have achieved their Technical Certificate in this way during their apprenticeship.  More apprenticeship progression will also have an impact on geographical coverage of certain subjects, if a former apprentice wishes to remain in their job while studying for a degree, they will need HE provision within a reasonable distance of their workplace.

What is Semta doing?

  • Semta has developed a Higher Education Strategy to articulate employers’ strategic needs / demands to the higher education sector.  The purpose of this is to accelerate reform within the HE sector, thus improving HE products and services offered to undergraduates, graduates and postgraduates.
  • Semta and five other SSCs has recently proposed starting Engineering and Science Regional Forums as the model to engage employers, higher education institutions and other stakeholders in the process of solving local skills problems. If approved for funding, these forums will for the first time give Sector Skills Councils the resources necessary to work effectively with higher education other stakeholders (RDAs etc).
  • We responded strongly to the government’s Higher Education at Work - High Skills: High Value consultation, calling for better careers advice pre and post university, more effective mathematics teaching in schools, more work with primary level children to inspire HE study in science and engineering, funded exchange programmes to improve relations between academia and industry, funding for sandwich courses, and reform of funding structures to incentivise HE responsiveness and support academics’ involvement in industry.
  • Semta has developed a Higher Apprenticeship, which incorporates a Foundation Degree or HND into an apprenticeship framework, supported by skills-based qualifications at high levels.  This currently funded in Wales.
  • Semta has excellent working relationships with the Higher Education Academy Subject Centres of Engineering, Bioscience, Physical Sciences, Materials and Mathematics.  We use these relationships to voice employer needs which have been established through the Sector Skills Agreements and Sector Qualifications Strategies, to influence curricular development, and to improve the employability of graduates in these subjects.
  • Semta works with the Quality Assurance Agency to review the benchmark statements which set the standards for degree-level study.
  • In our response to the government consultation, we made it clear that there should be reform to the funding structures to incentivise demand-led support in HE.  This means giving HE and employers the funds to start developing the business driven higher level skills and education products and services that employers, undergraduates, graduates, and postgraduates demand, and are subsequently prepared to buy.
  • We also recommended more incentives/recognition for academics who engage with business, sending the message to the HE workforce that this kind of activity is welcomed and worthwhile.  University career structures and succession plans must give more importance, currency and priority to relevant job roles where business / industry knowledge and experience will add value; thus encouraging staff in these job roles to maintain/improve their business/industry knowledge and experience via employer secondments. However, these career structures and succession planning processes must be transparent to give staff the incentive to develop this knowledge and experience.  Such incentives would need to be part of existing performance metrics such as the Research Assessment Exercise and the Teaching Quality Assessment.  Currently, career academics seeking an international reputation and the kudos that accompanies it need to publish regularly in high impact scientific journals and to be picked for the University RAE return.  This means their focus is entirely on this activity, and not on building business links.
  • The government could also ease work permit applications for those students who have studied in UK universities in key subjects.

The evidence and facts

Trends in numbers of first degree graduates – % change year on year [1]

 

2003/04

2004/05

2005/06

2006/07

All students

3.4

4.9

3.1

1.0

Engineering & Technology

1.7

-1.0

1.0

0.7

Biological Sciences

9.4

4.8

2.4

4.5

Physical Sciences

-3.9

4.5

3.0

-3.3

Mathematical Sciences

5.8

-2.3

4.4

2.6

Computer Sciences

10.8

-0.5

-6.2

-12.7

 

Examples of the proportion of students in various subjects who are non-UK domiciled [2]

Subject

% of 2006/07 cohort non-UK domiciled

All students in UK institutions

14.8%

Mechanical Engineering

28.4%

Electrical and Electronic Engineering

40.3%

Chemical, Process and Energy Engineering

42.4%

General Engineering

29.8%

 

Number of students enrolling on four year degree courses that involve the student on an industrial or other placement for a year [3]

Students enrolling on any four year, first degree sandwich course - English higher education institutions - and the number of students actually on an industrial or other placement (a) in that year

Academic year

Number of students

Of which: number of students on placement

2001-02

91,280

(b) —

2002-03

88,285

14,295

2003-04

85,620

14,375

2004-05

86,090

15,015

2005-06

84,000

15,190

(a) Covers students on an industrial (or other placement).
(b) In 2001-02 students on industrial placements could not be identified separately from those studying abroad for the year as a whole.
Note:
Figures are on a HESA standard registration population and are rounded to the nearest five.
Source: Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)

 

Numbers of students enrolling on Sandwich Degree courses has increased, but the number of these students that decline the offer of work experience during the course has also increased. So statistically the enrolment numbers show an increase in students on these courses but the actual number of students that graduate from these courses without doing a year in industry has also increased; actually at a much higher rate than enrolments.

Five years after graduation, 25% of Engineering & Technology graduates are employed specifically in manufacturing 27% give their current sector of employment as “real estate, renting and business activities”, but many of these will be working in engineering consultancies, rather than the financial sector (which is often blamed for “skimming” the best engineering graduates on graduation). [4]

More information

Higher Education consultation and our response

Sainsbury Review of Science and Innovation: The Race to the Top

Innovation Nation - the government's response to the Sainsbury Review

QAA benchmark statements on subject standards

Download this Policy View in Word here.

 

Back to Views on Policy Issues

9 November 2008


Sources

[1] Summarised from HESA online statistics Table 14a – HE qualifications obtained in the UK by mode of study, domicile, gender and subject areas.

[2] HESA online statistics Table 2e - All HE students by level of study, mode of study, subject of study, domicile and gender 2006/07.

[3] House of Commons Written Answer, Hansard 17 Jan 2007.

[4] HESA Destinations of Leavers from Higher Education Institutions Longitudinal Survey of the 2002/03 cohort Key Findings Report Published 2007.

Home Page | Contact Us | About Us | Register with us | Site Map

Copyright © 2008 Semta