Text-only image - click for high-contrast version Print image - click for printable version Larger text image - click to increase text size Smaller text image - click to descrease text size
The Sector Skills Council for Science, Engineering and Manufacturing Technologies

Views on Policy Issues - Higher Apprenticeship (UK)

What do you think?

Semta represents the views of our employers across government and the media.  If you are an employer in the science, engineering, or manufacturing technology sectors, we welcome your views at policy@semta.org.uk

The issue

  • Semta has developed a Higher Apprenticeship in Engineering Technology, which comprises a NVQ Level 2(basic skills) Foundation Degree (or HNC / HND / Bachelors Degree), NVQ Level 4, Key Skills Level 3 and UK-Spec.  It is ideally suited to high achieving young people who are looking for an alternative to full-time higher education.  It is also a potential development framework for adults moving into professional engineering roles in companies.
  • Funding for the programme has been particularly difficult to arrange in England, where the different funding bodies (LSC and HEFCE) have not effectively worked together to provide a seamless funding stream.  In Wales, the programme has had a much smoother implementation, as the funding system was more straightforward.
  • Funding arrangements for the Higher Apprenticeship in Engineering for England have only recently been finalised and the process has been difficult.  
  • The Higher Apprenticeship is funded at the Advanced Apprenticeship rate, which does not reflect the true costs of delivering the learning and supporting the learner.
  • Employers that have had difficulty accessing appropriate funding up until now include; Honda, Nissan, Cobham Aerospace, Prodrive, GE Avionics, British Sugar, Jaguar Landrover, Network Rail, E-ON and numerous SME employers.

Semta Employers’ View [1]

  • Semta’s employers invest up to £70,000 for each apprentice they employ over three years of the Higher Apprenticeship programme.  They have been frustrated at the difficulty in accessing appropriate funding in a standard manner across the UK, to offset at least part of this investment.  They feel that their considerable effort in developing the programme with Semta, and their ongoing substantial financial commitment to each student, should be recognised.
  • Employers are also concerned with the inevitable bureaucracy involved in dealing with multiple funding bodies, and would prefer to deal with a single funding body and single funding stream.
  • Several employers are currently interested in offering the Higher Apprenticeship including Honda, Cobham Aerospace, Prodrive, GE Avionics, Jaguar Landrover, E-ON, Delphi Diesel Systems and numerous SME employers but are currently dissuaded from doing so by the funding issues in England.  Semta believes there is scope to significantly expand the programme if these issues were addressed, both with young people entering the sector and adults moving to more senior positions.
  • The creation of the Higher Apprenticeship was in direct response to employer need, but the difficulties faced in securing UK-wide funding has demonstrated the lack of flexibility in the current system to enable Semta to address these needs.
  • If the programme is to expand to meet the needs of all employers who could benefit from it, both the amount of funding and process of applying for it will need to improve, otherwise small firms and training providers will not engage.
  • Employers who are currently engaged with the programme are impressed by its rigour, its positive impact on recruitment, and its close match with employer needs.

What is Semta doing?

  • Semta has long been negotiating with funding bodies across the UK to address the funding issues.  In December 2008, Semta received final approval to include the programme in the LSC funding framework.
  • Semta developed the framework and the content with a good cross section of stakeholders including employers, Universities, FE Colleges, training providers, trade associations, trade unions, professional institutions and funding bodies.  Semta negotiated with providers (including universities) to ensure the programme met employers’ needs and was attractive to potential recruits.  Semta will continue to do this, in consultation with employers.

What else needs to be done?

  • Funding bodies – funding for the Higher Apprenticeship framework should be ring-fenced in each administration, enabling a single point of contact for employers and providers.
  • Government – public support and endorsement for such initiatives, which are developed by SSCs in direct response to employer needs.
  • Government and funding bodies – consider increasing the funding allocation for the Higher Apprenticeship, to reflect the true cost and value of the development and delivery of the programme.

Evidence and facts

  • 153 Higher Apprentices (Engineering Technology) are currently on programme
  • Higher Apprenticeship in Engineering Technology is current being offered in SW and NW England and Wales
  • Airbus UK, Rolls Royce and Lloyds Register are currently using the Higher Apprenticeship in Engineering Technology

More information

The Higher Apprenticeship Framework on the Semta website

Download this Policy View in Word here.

Back to Views on Policy Issues


10 December 2008

 


Sources

[1] Semta employer views on the Higher Apprenticeship are gathered from Semta’s 4 Nations Group and National Training Frameworks Sub-Committee

Home Page | Contact Us | About Us | Register with us | Site Map

Copyright © 2008 Semta